<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (11) TMI 10 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127154</link>
    <description>Commission agents who, with authority from their principals, sell goods and pass property in them to buyers are treated as dealers under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, because they carry on the business of selling goods rather than acting as mere brokers. The Act&#039;s charging provision therefore applies to such agents, subject to any available exemption. On the licence issue, rusum collected in the locality as an accepted trade charge was treated as part of the agreed commission or brokerage, not as part of the goods&#039; price, so it did not breach the licence conditions under Section 8. The exemption remained available and the tax demands could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:39:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (11) TMI 10 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127154</link>
      <description>Commission agents who, with authority from their principals, sell goods and pass property in them to buyers are treated as dealers under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, because they carry on the business of selling goods rather than acting as mere brokers. The Act&#039;s charging provision therefore applies to such agents, subject to any available exemption. On the licence issue, rusum collected in the locality as an accepted trade charge was treated as part of the agreed commission or brokerage, not as part of the goods&#039; price, so it did not breach the licence conditions under Section 8. The exemption remained available and the tax demands could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>