<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (1) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127133</link>
    <description>Best judgment sales tax assessment is sustainable where the dealer fails to produce account books or credible material to prove actual turnover, and the assessing authority makes a fair estimate on available evidence and surrounding circumstances. The Calcutta HC noted that repeated opportunities were given, objections and evidence were considered under Rule 54, and reasons were recorded for the estimated turnover. An assessment will not fail merely because it rests on estimation, provided the authority acts honestly and not dishonestly, vindictively, or capriciously; the appellate reduction of the taxable turnover was also upheld on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:17:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (1) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127133</link>
      <description>Best judgment sales tax assessment is sustainable where the dealer fails to produce account books or credible material to prove actual turnover, and the assessing authority makes a fair estimate on available evidence and surrounding circumstances. The Calcutta HC noted that repeated opportunities were given, objections and evidence were considered under Rule 54, and reasons were recorded for the estimated turnover. An assessment will not fail merely because it rests on estimation, provided the authority acts honestly and not dishonestly, vindictively, or capriciously; the appellate reduction of the taxable turnover was also upheld on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>