<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (8) TMI 15 - ASSAM HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127132</link>
    <description>Under the Assam Sales Tax Act, 1947, revisional jurisdiction could include enhancement of assessment because the revisional power under Section 31(1) was subject to the Act, the appellate authority was expressly empowered to enhance under Section 30(4), and Section 32(2) supported that broader supervisory control. An enhancement order, being prejudicial, also had to comply with the proviso to Section 31(1) by giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard. On the facts stated, that safeguard was satisfied because the assessee was heard, a further hearing was adjourned to Tezpur, counsel appeared, and a sales statement was submitted, which formed the basis of enhancement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:09:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (8) TMI 15 - ASSAM HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127132</link>
      <description>Under the Assam Sales Tax Act, 1947, revisional jurisdiction could include enhancement of assessment because the revisional power under Section 31(1) was subject to the Act, the appellate authority was expressly empowered to enhance under Section 30(4), and Section 32(2) supported that broader supervisory control. An enhancement order, being prejudicial, also had to comply with the proviso to Section 31(1) by giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard. On the facts stated, that safeguard was satisfied because the assessee was heard, a further hearing was adjourned to Tezpur, counsel appeared, and a sales statement was submitted, which formed the basis of enhancement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>