<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (9) TMI 30 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127125</link>
    <description>The exemption for &quot;cooked food&quot; in item No. 10 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act was construed in context as covering solid food prepared by heat, such as biscuits and cakes, but not tea, coffee or other drinks; however, the wording &quot;or other place where cooked food is served&quot; was wide enough to include service on a railway platform or in a train, so solid cooked refreshments served there remained exempt. Penalties under Section 12(3A) could not be imposed on returns relating to a period before that sub-section came into force, because the provision was not shown to have retrospective effect. The penalties were therefore invalid and had to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:19:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=164003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (9) TMI 30 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127125</link>
      <description>The exemption for &quot;cooked food&quot; in item No. 10 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act was construed in context as covering solid food prepared by heat, such as biscuits and cakes, but not tea, coffee or other drinks; however, the wording &quot;or other place where cooked food is served&quot; was wide enough to include service on a railway platform or in a train, so solid cooked refreshments served there remained exempt. Penalties under Section 12(3A) could not be imposed on returns relating to a period before that sub-section came into force, because the provision was not shown to have retrospective effect. The penalties were therefore invalid and had to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>