https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127122 An Ordinance was treated as law in force from publication, even if its actual operation could begin later on the prescribed administrative step, and the Chief Commissioner was competent to bring it into operation under the Ordinance and the continuing-laws order, so the sales tax levy was sustained. By contrast, amendments to Schedule II were invalid because the statutory scheme required prior notice of proposed amendments and reconsideration after the notice period, and those mandatory steps were not followed. The court treated that procedure as essential to protect assessees and allow objections before finalisation, so the original Schedule II remained operative and only partial relief was granted. en-us Sat, 17 Mar 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:53:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127122 An Ordinance was treated as law in force from publication, even if its actual operation could begin later on the prescribed administrative step, and the Chief Commissioner was competent to bring it into operation under the Ordinance and the continuing-laws order, so the sales tax levy was sustained. By contrast, amendments to Schedule II were invalid because the statutory scheme required prior notice of proposed amendments and reconsideration after the notice period, and those mandatory steps were not followed. The court treated that procedure as essential to protect assessees and allow objections before finalisation, so the original Schedule II remained operative and only partial relief was granted. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Sat, 17 Mar 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127122