<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1943 (3) TMI 13 - MADRAS FEDERAL COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127107</link>
    <description>A tax levied on the first sale of goods by a manufacturer or producer under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 was held to be a sales tax, not a duty of excise, even though it attached at the first sale. The Court followed its earlier view that the two levies are distinct and declined to depart from that position. The levy therefore remained within provincial legislative competence and outside the central excise field, so the challenge to its validity failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 1943 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1943 (3) TMI 13 - MADRAS FEDERAL COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127107</link>
      <description>A tax levied on the first sale of goods by a manufacturer or producer under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 was held to be a sales tax, not a duty of excise, even though it attached at the first sale. The Court followed its earlier view that the two levies are distinct and declined to depart from that position. The levy therefore remained within provincial legislative competence and outside the central excise field, so the challenge to its validity failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 1943 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>