<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1946 (5) TMI 10 - BIHAR  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127100</link>
    <description>Taxable turnover could not be raised to the full returned figure merely because cash memos were not produced where the materials supported a lower reasonable estimate and the Sales Tax Officer had already accepted a reduced taxable turnover. The controlling question was whether the dealer had transactions in tax-free goods and, if so, what their turnover was. On that basis, the higher authority&#039;s enhancement was not justified, and the assessment was required to be modified by restoring the lower estimate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:00:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1946 (5) TMI 10 - BIHAR  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127100</link>
      <description>Taxable turnover could not be raised to the full returned figure merely because cash memos were not produced where the materials supported a lower reasonable estimate and the Sales Tax Officer had already accepted a reduced taxable turnover. The controlling question was whether the dealer had transactions in tax-free goods and, if so, what their turnover was. On that basis, the higher authority&#039;s enhancement was not justified, and the assessment was required to be modified by restoring the lower estimate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>