<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (2) TMI 7 - MADRAS HIGH COURTVATLaws Copyright 2013</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127085</link>
    <description>Section 8 exempted commission agency transactions only where the dealer acted for a known principal, the principal was specified in the accounts, and the remuneration was confined to agreed commission or brokerage. On the buying side, rusum shown as part of transaction costs and passed through the agent was treated as a legitimate charge within the exemption, so the buying turnover was exempt. On the selling side, rusum collected from purchasers without proof that it was payable to the principal was treated as the agent&#039;s own profit and fell outside the exemption, so the selling turnover was taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:35:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (2) TMI 7 - MADRAS HIGH COURTVATLaws Copyright 2013</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127085</link>
      <description>Section 8 exempted commission agency transactions only where the dealer acted for a known principal, the principal was specified in the accounts, and the remuneration was confined to agreed commission or brokerage. On the buying side, rusum shown as part of transaction costs and passed through the agent was treated as a legitimate charge within the exemption, so the buying turnover was exempt. On the selling side, rusum collected from purchasers without proof that it was payable to the principal was treated as the agent&#039;s own profit and fell outside the exemption, so the selling turnover was taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>