<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 630 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127063</link>
    <description>The Departmental appeal was allowed by the Tribunal due to procedural lapses, including the ex parte order passed without hearing respondents, lack of communication of allegations before the original order, and issues regarding admissibility of exemptions and limitation. The Tribunal directed a fresh adjudication process with a two-month time limit and emphasized the importance of procedural fairness, communication, adherence to timelines, and cooperation from all parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:51:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 630 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127063</link>
      <description>The Departmental appeal was allowed by the Tribunal due to procedural lapses, including the ex parte order passed without hearing respondents, lack of communication of allegations before the original order, and issues regarding admissibility of exemptions and limitation. The Tribunal directed a fresh adjudication process with a two-month time limit and emphasized the importance of procedural fairness, communication, adherence to timelines, and cooperation from all parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>