https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127061 The dispute concerned whether Revenue had shown a prima facie case for stay against an order granting benefit under Notification No. 214/86. The record notes that the activity involved receipt of scrap, conversion into billets and rectangular parts, and further supply of those parts to hand tool manufacturers, with job work understood in terms of the notification. On that prima facie view, no irregularity was found in the respondents' conduct, and stay of the impugned orders was refused. en-us Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:51:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127061 The dispute concerned whether Revenue had shown a prima facie case for stay against an order granting benefit under Notification No. 214/86. The record notes that the activity involved receipt of scrap, conversion into billets and rectangular parts, and further supply of those parts to hand tool manufacturers, with job work understood in terms of the notification. On that prima facie view, no irregularity was found in the respondents' conduct, and stay of the impugned orders was refused. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127061