<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 627 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127056</link>
    <description>A valuation dispute under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act concerned soaps supplied exclusively to the Ministry of Defence and marked not for retail sale. On the record, the goods were not intended for retail trade, so the appellants showed a strong prima facie case that declaration of maximum retail price was not required. Total waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted, and coercive recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 11:13:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 627 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127056</link>
      <description>A valuation dispute under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act concerned soaps supplied exclusively to the Ministry of Defence and marked not for retail sale. On the record, the goods were not intended for retail trade, so the appellants showed a strong prima facie case that declaration of maximum retail price was not required. Total waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted, and coercive recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>