<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 267 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127055</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found the winding-up petition inadmissible due to the disputed debt being subject to arbitration, the debt being bona fide disputed, and the appellant&#039;s sound financial position. The lower courts&#039; judgments were set aside, and the civil appeal was allowed, dismissing the winding-up petition with costs to be shared equally by the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 267 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127055</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found the winding-up petition inadmissible due to the disputed debt being subject to arbitration, the debt being bona fide disputed, and the appellant&#039;s sound financial position. The lower courts&#039; judgments were set aside, and the civil appeal was allowed, dismissing the winding-up petition with costs to be shared equally by the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>