<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 901 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127048</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned in the service tax matter before the SC, and the civil appeal was then dismissed. The text records only this procedural outcome and does not set out any substantive legal reasoning, interpretation, or relief on the underlying service tax issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 901 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127048</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned in the service tax matter before the SC, and the civil appeal was then dismissed. The text records only this procedural outcome and does not set out any substantive legal reasoning, interpretation, or relief on the underlying service tax issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>