https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127043 The Tribunal dismissed the adjournment request by a non-party, emphasizing the lack of relevance as the individual was not directly involved in the proceedings. It upheld the demand of over Rs. 19 crores on M/s. Pan Masala Pvt. Ltd. and associated penalties for clandestine activities involving excisable goods. Detailed findings confirmed discrepancies in stock and documents, leading to further scrutiny. The appellant's plea of financial hardship was viewed skeptically, considering the nature of the case. Prima facie findings highlighted inconsistencies in stock and documents, leading to specific directions on pre-deposit amounts and penalties. en-us Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:16:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127043 The Tribunal dismissed the adjournment request by a non-party, emphasizing the lack of relevance as the individual was not directly involved in the proceedings. It upheld the demand of over Rs. 19 crores on M/s. Pan Masala Pvt. Ltd. and associated penalties for clandestine activities involving excisable goods. Detailed findings confirmed discrepancies in stock and documents, leading to further scrutiny. The appellant's plea of financial hardship was viewed skeptically, considering the nature of the case. Prima facie findings highlighted inconsistencies in stock and documents, leading to specific directions on pre-deposit amounts and penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127043