https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127029 A company petition was treated as not maintainable where the verifying affidavit was pre-dated and therefore did not validly verify the petition as filed. The irregularity was not cured by any subsequent affidavit. The representative who filed and argued the petition also failed to produce authorisation from the petitioners, resulting in non-compliance with the applicable Company Law Board Regulations. In the absence of rectification of these procedural defects, the petition was rejected at the threshold and the merits were not examined. en-us Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127029 A company petition was treated as not maintainable where the verifying affidavit was pre-dated and therefore did not validly verify the petition as filed. The irregularity was not cured by any subsequent affidavit. The representative who filed and argued the petition also failed to produce authorisation from the petitioners, resulting in non-compliance with the applicable Company Law Board Regulations. In the absence of rectification of these procedural defects, the petition was rejected at the threshold and the merits were not examined. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127029