<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 920 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127012</link>
    <description>A status quo order was treated as preserving the existing position on title, possession and construction, and it did not permit further development activity, transfer of title or parting with possession. Correspondence with authorities for permissions or approvals was not, by itself, prohibited, but any act altering the land&#039;s existing condition could be restrained. The Court also noted that, in proceedings to enforce an interim restraint, it may use its inherent powers to prevent continuation of the breach and issue restorative directions to undo changes if necessary, so that the status quo existing on the date of the order is maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 920 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127012</link>
      <description>A status quo order was treated as preserving the existing position on title, possession and construction, and it did not permit further development activity, transfer of title or parting with possession. Correspondence with authorities for permissions or approvals was not, by itself, prohibited, but any act altering the land&#039;s existing condition could be restrained. The Court also noted that, in proceedings to enforce an interim restraint, it may use its inherent powers to prevent continuation of the breach and issue restorative directions to undo changes if necessary, so that the status quo existing on the date of the order is maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>