https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127005 A post-sale dispute between an auction purchaser and the electricity company over clearance of pre-liquidation dues fell outside company court jurisdiction under the winding up scheme. The court held that, because the utility was not asserting a claim against the company in liquidation and no distribution or priority issue under the Companies Act, 1956 arose, section 446(2) did not authorise clarification or modification of the sale orders. It further held that the condition requiring payment of outstanding arrears before a fresh or temporary electricity connection was a lawful supply condition that continued to apply. The applicant therefore could not obtain electricity connection without first satisfying the dues requirement. en-us Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127005 A post-sale dispute between an auction purchaser and the electricity company over clearance of pre-liquidation dues fell outside company court jurisdiction under the winding up scheme. The court held that, because the utility was not asserting a claim against the company in liquidation and no distribution or priority issue under the Companies Act, 1956 arose, section 446(2) did not authorise clarification or modification of the sale orders. It further held that the condition requiring payment of outstanding arrears before a fresh or temporary electricity connection was a lawful supply condition that continued to apply. The applicant therefore could not obtain electricity connection without first satisfying the dues requirement. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127005