<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 928 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127004</link>
    <description>The court held that the company petition under Section 433 of the Companies Act was not maintainable against the first respondent due to an exemption. It was also determined that the second respondent was not considered a company under the Companies Act. The court rejected the argument for posting the matter for evidence and dismissed the appeal, advising the appellants to pursue remedies in the appropriate court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 928 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127004</link>
      <description>The court held that the company petition under Section 433 of the Companies Act was not maintainable against the first respondent due to an exemption. It was also determined that the second respondent was not considered a company under the Companies Act. The court rejected the argument for posting the matter for evidence and dismissed the appeal, advising the appellants to pursue remedies in the appropriate court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>