https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127000 The Court dismissed the appeals, rejecting the appellants' claims based on the approved VRS scheme, the principle of estoppel, and the higher benefits received compared to the stipulated Office Memorandum. The Court held that the appellants were not entitled to compensation based on a different calculation method as the approved scheme provided by IRCC differed from the Gujarat pattern. The principle of estoppel was applied, stating that once VRS payments were accepted, the employer-employee relationship ceased, precluding further claims. The Court also emphasized the inadmissibility of internal notes as a basis for legal claims. en-us Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:36:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127000 The Court dismissed the appeals, rejecting the appellants' claims based on the approved VRS scheme, the principle of estoppel, and the higher benefits received compared to the stipulated Office Memorandum. The Court held that the appellants were not entitled to compensation based on a different calculation method as the approved scheme provided by IRCC differed from the Gujarat pattern. The principle of estoppel was applied, stating that once VRS payments were accepted, the employer-employee relationship ceased, precluding further claims. The Court also emphasized the inadmissibility of internal notes as a basis for legal claims. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=127000