<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 847 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126996</link>
    <description>Vicarious criminal liability for company offences cannot be imposed on a person merely because their name appears in company records or they are shown as a shareholder. Specific averments are required in the complaint to show that the person was in charge of, and responsible for, the conduct of the company&#039;s business at the relevant time. Where the complaint contains only general allegations and no material links the person to day-to-day management or control, proceedings are unsustainable. On the facts stated, the petitioners were shown only as shareholders, with no specific role attributed to them, so the proceedings against them were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 847 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126996</link>
      <description>Vicarious criminal liability for company offences cannot be imposed on a person merely because their name appears in company records or they are shown as a shareholder. Specific averments are required in the complaint to show that the person was in charge of, and responsible for, the conduct of the company&#039;s business at the relevant time. Where the complaint contains only general allegations and no material links the person to day-to-day management or control, proceedings are unsustainable. On the facts stated, the petitioners were shown only as shareholders, with no specific role attributed to them, so the proceedings against them were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>