https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126986 The Bench concluded that the restraint order dated January 12, 2010, should not be modified, as the reasons given in the order aligned with the interim reliefs sought by the petitioners. Therefore, the applications for modification (C.A. No. 61 of 2010 and C.A. No. 63 of 2010) were dismissed, with liberty granted to respondent No. 5 to seek early disposal of the case upon completion of pleadings. en-us Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:59:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126986 The Bench concluded that the restraint order dated January 12, 2010, should not be modified, as the reasons given in the order aligned with the interim reliefs sought by the petitioners. Therefore, the applications for modification (C.A. No. 61 of 2010 and C.A. No. 63 of 2010) were dismissed, with liberty granted to respondent No. 5 to seek early disposal of the case upon completion of pleadings. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126986