<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 776 - COMPANY LAW BOARD - KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126985</link>
    <description>The petition filed under section 186 of the Companies Act seeking AGM postponement and document provision was dismissed. The court held that the relief sought did not align with section 186 provisions, which are specific to ordering special meetings, not postponing AGMs. The respondent&#039;s willingness to provide inspection of records in compliance with the Act was considered valid. The petitioner&#039;s claims were deemed misconceived, frivolous, vexatious, and not maintainable, resulting in the dismissal of the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:19:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 776 - COMPANY LAW BOARD - KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126985</link>
      <description>The petition filed under section 186 of the Companies Act seeking AGM postponement and document provision was dismissed. The court held that the relief sought did not align with section 186 provisions, which are specific to ordering special meetings, not postponing AGMs. The respondent&#039;s willingness to provide inspection of records in compliance with the Act was considered valid. The petitioner&#039;s claims were deemed misconceived, frivolous, vexatious, and not maintainable, resulting in the dismissal of the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>