<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1293 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126982</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the company petition as the petitioners did not meet the criteria under section 399 of the Companies Act. The court found that the petitioners were not members of the company at the time of filing the petition, leading to its dismissal. The court criticized the petitioners for engaging in forum shopping and trying to circumvent a High Court order allowing the Diocese of Tirunelveli to maintain its administration with the elected office bearers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:31:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1293 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126982</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the company petition as the petitioners did not meet the criteria under section 399 of the Companies Act. The court found that the petitioners were not members of the company at the time of filing the petition, leading to its dismissal. The court criticized the petitioners for engaging in forum shopping and trying to circumvent a High Court order allowing the Diocese of Tirunelveli to maintain its administration with the elected office bearers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>