https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126981 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Company Law Board's orders directing the reinstatement of respondent No. 1 as a director or the purchase of his shares. The court affirmed the broad powers of the Company Law Board under the Companies Act to address oppression and mismanagement issues, emphasizing that the Board's jurisdiction is not limited by other provisions of the Act. The appeal was rejected, with no costs awarded to either party. en-us Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126981 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Company Law Board's orders directing the reinstatement of respondent No. 1 as a director or the purchase of his shares. The court affirmed the broad powers of the Company Law Board under the Companies Act to address oppression and mismanagement issues, emphasizing that the Board's jurisdiction is not limited by other provisions of the Act. The appeal was rejected, with no costs awarded to either party. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126981