<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 823 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126973</link>
    <description>The petition for disclosure of official documents, salary disbursement, board resolutions, committee of management appointment, accounts enquiry, and management control injunction was heard. The Bench ordered the inspection of specific documents under section 163 of the Companies Act, 1956, rejecting requests beyond its scope. The petitioner&#039;s claim for salary disbursement and remuneration relief was denied as falling outside the scope of section 163. Relief sought beyond section 163&#039;s scope was also rejected. The petitioner was allowed to inspect specific documents within 15 days, emphasizing compliance with the Companies Act provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:49:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 823 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126973</link>
      <description>The petition for disclosure of official documents, salary disbursement, board resolutions, committee of management appointment, accounts enquiry, and management control injunction was heard. The Bench ordered the inspection of specific documents under section 163 of the Companies Act, 1956, rejecting requests beyond its scope. The petitioner&#039;s claim for salary disbursement and remuneration relief was denied as falling outside the scope of section 163. Relief sought beyond section 163&#039;s scope was also rejected. The petitioner was allowed to inspect specific documents within 15 days, emphasizing compliance with the Companies Act provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>