https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126954 In a company matter, the Company Law Board could entertain execution under section 634A of the Companies Act, 1956 for enforcing a High Court appellate order under section 10F, because the appellate decree had to be worked out before the forum originally seized of the proceedings. The jurisdictional objection therefore failed. The Board also did not exceed its powers by fixing a payment timeline and granting protective directions, as those measures were necessary to secure compliance with the appellate mandate and preserve the subject matter until completion of exit formalities. The enforcement order was sustained and the appeal was rejected. en-us Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126954 In a company matter, the Company Law Board could entertain execution under section 634A of the Companies Act, 1956 for enforcing a High Court appellate order under section 10F, because the appellate decree had to be worked out before the forum originally seized of the proceedings. The jurisdictional objection therefore failed. The Board also did not exceed its powers by fixing a payment timeline and granting protective directions, as those measures were necessary to secure compliance with the appellate mandate and preserve the subject matter until completion of exit formalities. The enforcement order was sustained and the appeal was rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126954