<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 924 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126942</link>
    <description>The petition seeking rectification of the register of members to include 4,000 shares allotted to the petitioner was dismissed by the Board. The Board found that the petitioner failed to provide concrete evidence to prove the disputed resolution, especially regarding the alleged forgery. As the forgery claim was central and not adequately addressed, the Board concluded that the civil court was the appropriate forum for resolving the issue. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the matter in the civil court within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:00:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 924 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126942</link>
      <description>The petition seeking rectification of the register of members to include 4,000 shares allotted to the petitioner was dismissed by the Board. The Board found that the petitioner failed to provide concrete evidence to prove the disputed resolution, especially regarding the alleged forgery. As the forgery claim was central and not adequately addressed, the Board concluded that the civil court was the appropriate forum for resolving the issue. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the matter in the civil court within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>