https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126938 The court dismissed the petition on the grounds of maintainability as the petitioner failed to prove his shareholding and lacked the locus standi to file the petition under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956. Other issues raised, including allegations of oppression and mismanagement, legitimacy of meetings and resolutions, and fabrication in company records, were not addressed due to the dismissal based on the petitioner's failure to meet the statutory requirements. en-us Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:29:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126938 The court dismissed the petition on the grounds of maintainability as the petitioner failed to prove his shareholding and lacked the locus standi to file the petition under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956. Other issues raised, including allegations of oppression and mismanagement, legitimacy of meetings and resolutions, and fabrication in company records, were not addressed due to the dismissal based on the petitioner's failure to meet the statutory requirements. Case-Laws Companies Law Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126938