https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126937 The court found that the point of limitation did not apply in this case as the petitioner continuously made efforts to resolve the issue. The court concluded that the petition was maintainable under section 111A of the Companies Act, 1956, and directed the respondent company to rectify the register of members, substitute the petitioner's name for the shares, issue share certificates, and provide any accrued benefits to the petitioner. The petition was disposed of with these directions and no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:27:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126937 The court found that the point of limitation did not apply in this case as the petitioner continuously made efforts to resolve the issue. The court concluded that the petition was maintainable under section 111A of the Companies Act, 1956, and directed the respondent company to rectify the register of members, substitute the petitioner's name for the shares, issue share certificates, and provide any accrued benefits to the petitioner. The petition was disposed of with these directions and no order as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126937