https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126919 The Tribunal interpreted Section 4A regarding different retail sale prices on Air Conditioner packages, allowing the appellant's explanation for the varying Maximum Retail Prices in different areas. Citing a previous case, the Tribunal emphasized that each MRP should be the assessable value for duty payment. By maintaining consistency with past decisions, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, ensuring uniform application of the law and setting a precedent for similar cases. en-us Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:48:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126919 The Tribunal interpreted Section 4A regarding different retail sale prices on Air Conditioner packages, allowing the appellant's explanation for the varying Maximum Retail Prices in different areas. Citing a previous case, the Tribunal emphasized that each MRP should be the assessable value for duty payment. By maintaining consistency with past decisions, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, ensuring uniform application of the law and setting a precedent for similar cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126919