https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126917 The tribunal allowed the appellant to reconstruct and file the appeal that was claimed to have been filed before Tribunal Delhi in 1986. Despite discrepancies in records, evidence presented by the appellant indicated efforts to pursue the appeal. The tribunal concluded that the appeal was filed but misplaced by the registry, permitting the appellant to file a fresh appeal within a month. This decision aimed to address administrative errors, ensuring access to justice and upholding fairness in legal proceedings. en-us Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:44:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126917 The tribunal allowed the appellant to reconstruct and file the appeal that was claimed to have been filed before Tribunal Delhi in 1986. Despite discrepancies in records, evidence presented by the appellant indicated efforts to pursue the appeal. The tribunal concluded that the appeal was filed but misplaced by the registry, permitting the appellant to file a fresh appeal within a month. This decision aimed to address administrative errors, ensuring access to justice and upholding fairness in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126917