<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 817 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126916</link>
    <description>The court directed the company to rectify the share register by restoring the shares to the original holder and deleting the second respondent&#039;s name. The petitioner was instructed to obtain a succession certificate to prove her entitlement to the shares and reapply for their transmission. The court emphasized the importance of formal legal documentation in resolving disputes over share ownership and transmission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 18:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 817 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126916</link>
      <description>The court directed the company to rectify the share register by restoring the shares to the original holder and deleting the second respondent&#039;s name. The petitioner was instructed to obtain a succession certificate to prove her entitlement to the shares and reapply for their transmission. The court emphasized the importance of formal legal documentation in resolving disputes over share ownership and transmission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>