<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 770 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126910</link>
    <description>A company petition may proceed where the pleaded shareholding, on the respondents&#039; own materials, shows more than 10% of the issued, subscribed and paid-up capital under section 399 of the Companies Act, 1956, because the statutory qualification is prima facie met. The article also explains that a petition alleging fraud cannot be rejected at the threshold on the basis of income-tax returns or supposed admissions, since disputed facts require proof and such material is only evidentiary. On a demurrer-type objection, provisions such as Order 6 Rule 4, Order 7 Rule 11 and Order 12 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 do not permit final rejection where triable issues remain.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:45:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 770 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126910</link>
      <description>A company petition may proceed where the pleaded shareholding, on the respondents&#039; own materials, shows more than 10% of the issued, subscribed and paid-up capital under section 399 of the Companies Act, 1956, because the statutory qualification is prima facie met. The article also explains that a petition alleging fraud cannot be rejected at the threshold on the basis of income-tax returns or supposed admissions, since disputed facts require proof and such material is only evidentiary. On a demurrer-type objection, provisions such as Order 6 Rule 4, Order 7 Rule 11 and Order 12 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 do not permit final rejection where triable issues remain.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>