<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 916 - COMPANY LAW BOARD - KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126909</link>
    <description>The court directed the company to transfer 300 shares to the petitioner and update the shareholder register. The company was also ordered to release the dividend to the petitioner in accordance with the Companies Act. However, the petitioner was denied the claim for interest on the accrued dividend, as the delay in transferring shares was attributed to the demat form of the shares and not the company&#039;s fault.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:33:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 916 - COMPANY LAW BOARD - KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126909</link>
      <description>The court directed the company to transfer 300 shares to the petitioner and update the shareholder register. The company was also ordered to release the dividend to the petitioner in accordance with the Companies Act. However, the petitioner was denied the claim for interest on the accrued dividend, as the delay in transferring shares was attributed to the demat form of the shares and not the company&#039;s fault.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>