<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 915 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126908</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitioners&#039; claims of oppression and mismanagement, finding no violations of the Companies Act provisions regarding the AGM notice and insufficient evidence of the alleged Rs. 16 lakhs expenditure. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:57:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 915 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126908</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitioners&#039; claims of oppression and mismanagement, finding no violations of the Companies Act provisions regarding the AGM notice and insufficient evidence of the alleged Rs. 16 lakhs expenditure. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>