<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 915 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126900</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the application challenging a scheme of amalgamation and arrangement under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, ruling that the objector&#039;s plea for a hearing at the first motion stage was not maintainable. The Court emphasized the Companies Act&#039;s safeguards and opportunities for objections later in the process, highlighting the comprehensive framework that protects the rights of parties involved in such schemes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:33:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 915 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126900</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the application challenging a scheme of amalgamation and arrangement under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, ruling that the objector&#039;s plea for a hearing at the first motion stage was not maintainable. The Court emphasized the Companies Act&#039;s safeguards and opportunities for objections later in the process, highlighting the comprehensive framework that protects the rights of parties involved in such schemes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>