<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1058 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126885</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding up petition filed by RPGCL against the respondent-company, citing the substantial defense raised by the respondent regarding the disputed debt. The court emphasized the need for a full trial due to the contentious nature of the issues, referencing legal principles that winding up petitions should not be used to coerce payment of disputed debts. The outcome resulted in the petition being dismissed without costs, with the court&#039;s observations specified to the winding up petition and not prejudicing any future litigation between the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1058 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126885</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding up petition filed by RPGCL against the respondent-company, citing the substantial defense raised by the respondent regarding the disputed debt. The court emphasized the need for a full trial due to the contentious nature of the issues, referencing legal principles that winding up petitions should not be used to coerce payment of disputed debts. The outcome resulted in the petition being dismissed without costs, with the court&#039;s observations specified to the winding up petition and not prejudicing any future litigation between the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>