<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 812 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126879</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed, and the court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s orders, enforcing the settlement agreement between the parties. The court emphasized that any aggrieved parties must adopt independent proceedings to address their grievances. The order of costs was also upheld, reflecting the court&#039;s disapproval of the appellants&#039; attempts to undermine the settlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 812 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126879</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed, and the court upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s orders, enforcing the settlement agreement between the parties. The court emphasized that any aggrieved parties must adopt independent proceedings to address their grievances. The order of costs was also upheld, reflecting the court&#039;s disapproval of the appellants&#039; attempts to undermine the settlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>