<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 710 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126877</link>
    <description>The court held that the provision for warranty charges is a definite business liability allowable as a deduction for the assessee-company, based on a scientific basis and consistent policy applied globally. The court affirmed that the provision was not a contingent liability but a liability in presentie, allowing for the deduction during the relevant assessment years. The appeals were dismissed, confirming the entitlement of the assessee to make such provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 710 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126877</link>
      <description>The court held that the provision for warranty charges is a definite business liability allowable as a deduction for the assessee-company, based on a scientific basis and consistent policy applied globally. The court affirmed that the provision was not a contingent liability but a liability in presentie, allowing for the deduction during the relevant assessment years. The appeals were dismissed, confirming the entitlement of the assessee to make such provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>