https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126875 Where a contractual dispute falls within a wide arbitration clause and turns on disputed facts and contract construction, the writ court should ordinarily decline to decide liability on merits and leave the parties to the agreed arbitral forum. Applying the restriction on judicial intervention under Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court treated the entire dispute, including liability under the contract, as arbitrable. It also directed release of the amounts deposited without prejudice to the parties' rights before the Arbitral Tribunal. en-us Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126875 Where a contractual dispute falls within a wide arbitration clause and turns on disputed facts and contract construction, the writ court should ordinarily decline to decide liability on merits and leave the parties to the agreed arbitral forum. Applying the restriction on judicial intervention under Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court treated the entire dispute, including liability under the contract, as arbitrable. It also directed release of the amounts deposited without prejudice to the parties' rights before the Arbitral Tribunal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126875