<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 692 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126871</link>
    <description>The Company Law Board found in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent company to delete the names of joint holders added without consent from the register of members for the shares in question within 30 days. The petitioner&#039;s claim of ownership and request for rectification of the register was upheld, emphasizing the company&#039;s failure to provide sufficient justification for the insertion of the additional names.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:04:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 692 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126871</link>
      <description>The Company Law Board found in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondent company to delete the names of joint holders added without consent from the register of members for the shares in question within 30 days. The petitioner&#039;s claim of ownership and request for rectification of the register was upheld, emphasizing the company&#039;s failure to provide sufficient justification for the insertion of the additional names.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>