https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126867 The Company Law Board restrained respondent Nos. 1 and 2 from circulating a defamatory statement to shareholders during an annual general meeting. The Board found that the statement aimed to lower the esteem of the company and its independent directors, abusing provisions under the Companies Act for unnecessary publicity. Despite this decision, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 could still present their views at the meeting. The Board deemed the applicant's application maintainable and directed the company not to circulate the impugned statement, emphasizing the importance of preventing defamation and protecting the company's reputation and directors' integrity. en-us Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jul 2013 17:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126867 The Company Law Board restrained respondent Nos. 1 and 2 from circulating a defamatory statement to shareholders during an annual general meeting. The Board found that the statement aimed to lower the esteem of the company and its independent directors, abusing provisions under the Companies Act for unnecessary publicity. Despite this decision, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 could still present their views at the meeting. The Board deemed the applicant's application maintainable and directed the company not to circulate the impugned statement, emphasizing the importance of preventing defamation and protecting the company's reputation and directors' integrity. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126867