https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126859 Packaged seedless dates, treated as repacked fruit packages under the notified standards regime, were found to fall within the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the Packaged Commodities Rules, 1977. Because the labels already disclosed the essential particulars required for that class of goods, including net weight and retail price, absence of the manufacturer's name and address did not constitute a breach in the manner alleged. The purported violation of Section 39 and Rules 4, 6(1)(a) and 23(1) was therefore not established, and seizure on that basis could not be sustained. en-us Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:28:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126859 Packaged seedless dates, treated as repacked fruit packages under the notified standards regime, were found to fall within the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the Packaged Commodities Rules, 1977. Because the labels already disclosed the essential particulars required for that class of goods, including net weight and retail price, absence of the manufacturer's name and address did not constitute a breach in the manner alleged. The purported violation of Section 39 and Rules 4, 6(1)(a) and 23(1) was therefore not established, and seizure on that basis could not be sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126859