https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126858 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents, emphasizing the necessity of establishing intention to evade duty for the imposition of penalty under Section 11AC. The absence of evidence supporting clandestine removal of goods led to the rejection of the Revenue's appeal. en-us Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:18:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126858 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents, emphasizing the necessity of establishing intention to evade duty for the imposition of penalty under Section 11AC. The absence of evidence supporting clandestine removal of goods led to the rejection of the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126858