<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 667 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126851</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed the appeal by M/s. Cymex Time Ltd. against the imposition of a personal penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs on the Director under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found no evidence of personal involvement or knowledge of the Director in the actions leading to the penalty, leading to the penalty being set aside and the appeal allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:53:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 667 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126851</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed the appeal by M/s. Cymex Time Ltd. against the imposition of a personal penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs on the Director under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found no evidence of personal involvement or knowledge of the Director in the actions leading to the penalty, leading to the penalty being set aside and the appeal allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>