<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 233 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126844</link>
    <description>In a pedigree-based claim, every essential genealogical link must be proved by reliable admissible evidence. An ancient public document may be admissible as an official entry, but its probative value is limited if the source of information is uncertain, it is unsupported by trustworthy records, or it does not establish title. Judgments and recitals not inter partes cannot be used to prove the truth of their contents, and materials created after the dispute arose are vulnerable to the rule against post litem motam evidence. On the evidence, the plaintiffs failed to prove the crucial links in the genealogy and could not establish that they were the nearest reversioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 233 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126844</link>
      <description>In a pedigree-based claim, every essential genealogical link must be proved by reliable admissible evidence. An ancient public document may be admissible as an official entry, but its probative value is limited if the source of information is uncertain, it is unsupported by trustworthy records, or it does not establish title. Judgments and recitals not inter partes cannot be used to prove the truth of their contents, and materials created after the dispute arose are vulnerable to the rule against post litem motam evidence. On the evidence, the plaintiffs failed to prove the crucial links in the genealogy and could not establish that they were the nearest reversioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>