<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (8) TMI 69 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126830</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioner had no fundamental right to publish legislative proceedings against the Legislature&#039;s privileges. The principle of res judicata applied, barring re-litigation of previously decided issues. The Court upheld the validity of legislative procedures and rejected claims of staleness in proceedings due to prorogation. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:40:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (8) TMI 69 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126830</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioner had no fundamental right to publish legislative proceedings against the Legislature&#039;s privileges. The principle of res judicata applied, barring re-litigation of previously decided issues. The Court upheld the validity of legislative procedures and rejected claims of staleness in proceedings due to prorogation. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>