<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1263 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126825</link>
    <description>Under an approved total-exclusion scheme on a notified route, a private operator cannot be permitted to ply on any part of that route merely because the stretch is short or lies within town or village limits. The scheme, once approved and published, operates as law and excludes private operation on the notified route or any part of it unless the scheme itself allows it. A true intersection exists only where a non-notified route cuts across the notified route for onward travel; use of the same line of travel, even for a short stretch, amounts to overlapping. The High Court&#039;s contrary view was held erroneous and unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:00:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1263 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126825</link>
      <description>Under an approved total-exclusion scheme on a notified route, a private operator cannot be permitted to ply on any part of that route merely because the stretch is short or lies within town or village limits. The scheme, once approved and published, operates as law and excludes private operation on the notified route or any part of it unless the scheme itself allows it. A true intersection exists only where a non-notified route cuts across the notified route for onward travel; use of the same line of travel, even for a short stretch, amounts to overlapping. The High Court&#039;s contrary view was held erroneous and unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>