https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126820 Bonus could not be recovered under Section 6-H(1) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as part of "wages" or as deferred wages under the award, because that provision functions like an execution mechanism and cannot be used to decide a disputed substantive entitlement. The award granted reinstatement and partial back wages and allowances, but did not expressly award bonus. Since bonus is excluded from the statutory definition of "wages" under the Act and from "salary or wage" under the Payment of Bonus Act, the Labour Commissioner could not enlarge the award or determine a fresh claim under Section 6-H(1). The recovery orders were therefore unsustainable. en-us Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:12:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126820 Bonus could not be recovered under Section 6-H(1) of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as part of "wages" or as deferred wages under the award, because that provision functions like an execution mechanism and cannot be used to decide a disputed substantive entitlement. The award granted reinstatement and partial back wages and allowances, but did not expressly award bonus. Since bonus is excluded from the statutory definition of "wages" under the Act and from "salary or wage" under the Payment of Bonus Act, the Labour Commissioner could not enlarge the award or determine a fresh claim under Section 6-H(1). The recovery orders were therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126820