<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 709 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126818</link>
    <description>A special statutory procedure under the Sand Act and Rules governs seizure, objection, release, and disposal of vehicles used for illegal sand transport, so the general procedure under the Code of Criminal Procedure does not control interim custody. On that construction, the Magistrate has no jurisdiction to order release on the basis urged by the petitioners. The text also states that Division Bench rulings remain binding on a Single Judge unless displaced by a larger Bench, the Supreme Court, or legislative change, and that a stay in another proceeding does not remove their precedential force. Judicial discipline therefore requires adherence to those rulings or a reference if disagreement persists.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 709 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126818</link>
      <description>A special statutory procedure under the Sand Act and Rules governs seizure, objection, release, and disposal of vehicles used for illegal sand transport, so the general procedure under the Code of Criminal Procedure does not control interim custody. On that construction, the Magistrate has no jurisdiction to order release on the basis urged by the petitioners. The text also states that Division Bench rulings remain binding on a Single Judge unless displaced by a larger Bench, the Supreme Court, or legislative change, and that a stay in another proceeding does not remove their precedential force. Judicial discipline therefore requires adherence to those rulings or a reference if disagreement persists.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>